To: elizabethrich_clinic@gmail.com
From: brunothatchercpf_uri@yahoo.com
Dear Dr. Rich,
As requested, I have
reviewed the patient files you have sent. The reports are attached below, as is
my opinion about the cases.
With no further additions,
Bruno Thatcher
[Behavioral Specialist, Clinical Psychology Department – Clinical
Psychology Faculty, URI]
Attachment One:
“Patient
file number 10769 – Helena [Redacted]
Patient
records show a recommendation from one of the doctors to a psychologist due to
a mental disturbance, later dubbed as an episode.
Session
notes show that the patient came with her husband – who was described as
resistant. The episode was registered
but the patient was never fully diagnosed – the psychologist’s notes suggested
that the underlying cause would take years to be found. Medication was instead
given for the symptoms described – delusions, strong headaches, time and memory
distortion.
Medical
records also show that the patient was not born in the United States of
America, so environmental causes would be harder to pinpoint. There were also
additional risks due to two miscarriages – which could have provoked an
unbalanced production of hormones – and possible dormant conditions – possible
past trauma, not looked into due to lack of follow-up consultations.
After
analyzing this case, I believe it is possible to conclude that the patient
suffered from undifferentiated schizophrenia – possibly subduing with the intake of
medication, as after the consultation took place, no more episodes or
disturbances were recorded.”
Attachment Two:
“Patient
file number 89207 – Scott [Redacted]
Medical records show a possible genetic
predisposition for mental instability due to a previously recorded family
incident. Despite this, the patient never showed any sign or symptom of
schizophrenia – as any other mental instability – before
According to Doctor Rich’s notes, the
patient’s wife described a change in behavior after two occurrences surrounding
their daughter: her leukemia diagnosis and later unexpected death. Such would
suggest these events were the trigger behind the patient’s almost sudden behavior
change. Much like the patient’s grandmother, there seems to be an obsession in
a certain subject – in this case, the patient’s daughter, Emily – to the point
where anything else is considered unimportant and the attention span is
drastically altered. Not registered in those records, but indicated by the
patient’s wife – currently under Doctor Rich’s care – are symptoms such as
hallucinations and dissociation, which further emphasize the need of
professional counsel and medication.
As the patient stopped going to the
consultations – which could also be assumed as a symptom – and the wife seems
to be the only viable source of information about his most recent behavior,
there is no more viable information that can prove an accurate diagnosis,
despite the symptoms described pointing at either paranoid schizophrenia or undifferentiated schizophrenia.
Considering the patient’s priors, and taking
into account how his behavior changed after the trigger events, I predict that his behavior and mental health will
only deteriorate as time passes, unless treated as soon as possible. Currently,
the diagnosis does not, unfortunately, look favorable.”
Student
Commentary: Many might not feel the same way I do about this book, but “Almost
Gone” by Brian Sousa is one of those reads that just leaves the reader
speechless and yet, full of so many different feelings and emotions. For that
reason, I wanted to avoid things that might have been too obvious to discuss,
yet still talk about mundane – if not highly relatable – moments, as those are
the moments that truly make us ponder about life itself. So, in my search for
that middle ground, I debated between a critic and a creative piece, deciding
on the latter for its flexibility in terms of usage. However, I faced another
obstacle: the characters. Obviously, I wanted to talk about them, but couldn’t really talk as them, so I had to find an alternative. That was when I thought
about the two shrinks mentioned in the book, and how I could then create
another specialist that being an external factor, still had some weight in how
two of the most damaged characters (thought that might be up for debate) –
Helena and Scott – behaved and acted in the story, in an attempt to fill in the
blanks without actually doing it, using the information given to the reader
throughout the chapters and a possible reason as to why they acted the way they
did – or in Scott’s case, do.
Very cool idea! Love it!
ReplyDelete